Daily Kos

Richardson calls for paper ballots in NM UPDATED

Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 09:17:26 PM PDT

Well, looks like nobody brought this up yet, but Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, just cut the Gordian Knot of election reform here in New Mexico. In response to lawsuits by various New Mexico groups concerned over the integrity of the vote-counting process, and crediting those groups and citizen action with bringing this to the public consciousness it deserves, Richardson yesterday announced that New Mexico would adopt a uniform paper ballot for elections, and select approved optical scanners for the count. The paper ballots will ensure the verifyability of election results. link to Albuquerque Journal story

Plaintiff's Applaud Governor's Decision. Lawsuit Remains Until Relief is Implemented

           January 13, 2006, Albuquerque - On Thursday, January 12, 2005, New Mexico's Governor Bill Richardson and Attorney General Patricia Madrid demonstrated bold leadership by announcing a plan to make New Mexico an all-paper-ballot voting state.  This is a great day for New Mexicans because it means that we will be able to cast our votes with confidence that a mechanism is in place that will allow all votes to be counted and tallied and the results verified.

The Governor said that he will introduce legislation next week, at the beginning of the 30-day 2006 state legislative session that, if adopted, will accomplish two things:  1) it will mandate the use of optical scan paper ballots in all New Mexico elections, and (2) it will provide $11 million in state funding to purchase the necessary voting systems.  If the legislation is adopted by the legislature and implemented before the next election, inaccurate, unreliable and insecure electronic voting machines that produce no voter-verifiable and auditable paper record will be a thing of the past.

This Governor's proposal is a great victory for the many concerned citizens and organizations who have tirelessly advocated the change to paper ballots. And it is a great victory for the plaintiffs in Lopategui v. Vigil-Giron, a lawsuit in which the plaintiffs sought this very result. The lawsuit, filed in January 2005, seeks an injunction barring future use of the same unreliable, paperless electronic voting machines that will be replaced under the Governor's plan if the legislature adopts it.  A catalyst for the Governor's decision was the Lopategui plaintiffs' recent and successful effort to temporarily restrain the Secretary of State and county clerks from beginning the purchase of additional unreliable touch screen machines.

New Mexico's next statewide election is in June, 2006.  Thus it is critical that the Governor's proposal be implemented immediately so that all New Mexico voters will have confidence that their votes will count and can be verified. For this reason, the Lopategui plaintiffs intend to press forward with their lawsuit, particularly with their efforts to gather evidence needed to obtain judicial relief if the legislature does not adopt the Governor's plan , or if the statutory changes and funding adopted are too little or too late.

  In the Lopategui litigation, Plaintiffs have already obtained critical evidence in discovery about the untrustworthiness of touchscreen voting systems and the serious inadequacy of the Secretary of State's process for auditing election results.  By gathering more evidence through depositions and inspection of voting systems, plaintiffs will be in a position to seek timely judicial relief should the Governor's plan not be implemented.  As soon as New Mexico can assure that all voters, regardless of the color of their skin, where they live, or their physical ability are able to cast their votes on verifiable, auditable paper ballots, plaintiffs will give final, hearty congratulations to Governor Richardson, Attorney General Madrid, and the state legislature for protecting our democracy.

link

SANTA FE New Mexico is moving to a paper ballot-based system for its elections and the change could be in place by the November 2006 general election.
Governor Bill Richardson will propose legislation that requires a paper ballot system for voting machines.

He's proposing that lawmakers allocate eleven (m) million dollars to help pay for equipment and software.

Activists who oppose the use of electronic voting machines also back the change.

Currently, eleven New Mexico counties use a system of paper ballots that are automatically tabulated by an optical scan reader.

All 33 counties use that paper ballot system for mail-in absentee voting.

Tags: election reform, Bill Richardson, paper ballots, New Mexico (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 26 comments

  •  tips for my scoop (4.00 / 11)

    this happened yesterday, but I missed it while being in San Francisco for the day.  This got lost in the shuffle, but is really important, because various county level officials had been dragging their heels, which percipitated the lawsuits.  This is a real grass-roots victory.

    don't always believe what you think...

    by claude on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 09:18:58 PM PDT

  •  With his new plane (none / 0)

    He can deliver extra boxes of correctly filled out ballots, as needed, to the proper precincts! ;)
  •  Good (4.00 / 2)

    I hope other states follow suit. Since the paper exists, any close election result can force a visual examination of the ballots.
  •  One state down, (none / 1)

    49 more to go.

    Good work, New Mexico!

    "Soon the time will come to choose between what is easy, and what is right." - A. Dumbledore

    by epluribus on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 09:44:11 PM PDT

    •  One down, wrong State (none / 0)

      Paper ballots were enacted into Wisconsin law last week, with a provision for hand count in any recounts.

      NM does not yet, per the article, have a paper ballot law. the Gov. is merely calling for one.

      This is a test of the Emergency Free Speech System.
      This is only a test.
      If this had been an actual emergency, I'd already be locked up.

      by ben masel on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 11:20:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Be very carefull (4.00 / 4)

    Arizona has paper ballots but it is against the law to count the paper ballots if the election is contested. YOU can only run them back through the optical scanner.
    Also the optical scanners are very hackable. Check to see all the parameters of what they are proposint and check with Brad at Bradblog on details.
    •  Interesting. (none / 0)

      AZ seems to be the home of ballot suppression, from Rehnquist in his early years to ... well, 2004.  Nice tactic - thanks for the alert.  Repost this point here and there, let it propagate a warning.

      "You can't negotiate with reality" - James Kunstler

      by Bob Love on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:05:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Right (none / 0)

      It'd be best to count them by hand actually, but that would probably be very difficult unfortunately.
      •  the hand count of paper ballots (none / 0)

        is our ultimate resort if there is doubt of the outcome.  The tabulating machines have to be watched, of course, at at least now we will have an actual paper trail for verification

        don't always believe what you think...

        by claude on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:38:30 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  then that's the law to target for change! (none / 0)


      Re. katymine's comment "Arizona has paper ballots but it is against the law to count the paper ballots if the election is contested. You can only run them back through the optical scanner."

      Challenge that law and get it changed!

      Holy cow!, that ought to be really simple & straightforward.  I can't imagine any reasonable arguement could be brought up to oppose changing it.  Cost?  Negligible in relation to benefit.  Time consuming?  Ditto.  What else is there...?  Nothing that has any chance of convincing anyone.  So, go and do it!

    •  that's the law to change! (none / 0)


      (for some reason this didn't post the first time)

      Katymine said, "Arizona has paper ballots but it is against the law to count the paper ballots if the election is contested. You can only run them back through the optical scanner."

      Now change that law!

      There is no decent arguement that can be made against hand counts.  Cost: negligible compared to benefit.  Time-consuming:  ditto.  Can anyone possibly think of any arguement that would stand up...?

      So, go do it!

    •  Audit procedures important (none / 0)

      Paper ballots necessary, but not sufficient.  You need a robust audit procedure, too.

      John McCain voted against health care for kids.

      by Land of Enchantment on Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 06:14:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Happy to read this (none / 1)

    Thanks for posting it.  I'd like to see this get a lot of press.
    Appeal to the people who really do not trust the new machines...which is everyone I was in line with at the polls this past November, for local issues. We always used punch card ballots until this past election.

    War is not an adventure. It is a disease. It is like typhus. - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

    by Margot on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 09:52:14 PM PDT

    •  I'll be happy to vote on the paper ballot (none / 1)

      I voted in Texas in 2004 on a touch-screen machine with no receipt.  I had precisely no confidence that my vote would be counted.  Not that it mattered -- things would have to get a lot worse for Republicans before they bothered to steal elections in Texas.

      Nice work, claude!  I can seldom bring myself to read the Journal.  It makes the DaMN look good.

      I can't expect to live in a democracy if I'm not prepared to do the work of being a citizen.

      by Dallasdoc on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:06:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Doc (none / 0)

        I found out about this  from an e-mail and then went searching for some links to back it up. It surprised me that this got missed, but it's been all Alito, all day.  This is some good news, and ought to get some notice.  

        I've been on several email lists from various groups that have been pushing on this since the election.

        don't always believe what you think...

        by claude on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:35:36 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Our poll ladies (none / 0)

        Tried to be upbeat about it but...they weren't happy either.  No receipt, no confidence.  

        War is not an adventure. It is a disease. It is like typhus. - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

        by Margot on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:36:33 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  NY state has to replace its (none / 1)

    old machines....

    hearings locally had an overwhelming number state that paper optical scan is the way to go - expressing reservations about touch screen.

    According to the article only ONE person spoke in favor of touch screen

    •  NY and HAVA (none / 0)

      we are about to pick a new system to vote on...and there has been a pretty good fight to make sure it ISNT a computer, paperless system....seems es&s has come up with a system that meets NYS demands to have a paper trail and a clear one page grid design so we dont get that butterfly ballot crap...i think we will finally pick a scanner system

      but washington thinks we are taking to long to decide lol so they are threatening to SUE NY for dragging our feet in picking a system....

      funny thing is...if we hadnt 'dragged our feet' in NYS we would have been forced to pick a less verifyable and much more confusing system then the one es&s finally came up with.

      OIL UBER ALLES says "MORE WARS" McCain

      by KnotIookin on Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 04:30:39 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for the recommendations (none / 0)

    you all. I've got to go get some sleep.  See ya.

    don't always believe what you think...

    by claude on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 10:45:31 PM PDT

Permalink | 26 comments